About Me

Name:Michael A. Minton
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Wednesday’s Republican Debate a Disappointment

Wednesday’s Republican Debate a Disappointment

By: Michael A. Minton

Well, what can I say? The best part about the Republican debate in Johnston, Iowa, yesterday was when it was over. And even that took way too long. The format was less than enviable, and the moderator, a local newspaper editor, Carolyn Washburn, was snappy, disallowed discussion of Iraq and illegal immigration-two obviously hot issues during the campaign-and I think down-right rude.


I would hardly even call Wednesday’s platform a debate. It was more of a clock-watching round-robin, in which it seemed to have been pre-determined that there would not be a winner allowed. However, many did feel that my man Mitt came out on top.


Gov. Romney seemed to score a lot of points when talking about education and fiscal responsibility. He pointed out the fact that, while he was governor of Massachusetts, schoolchildren there led the nation in many areas of academia. And there is nobody who can question his abilities as a savvy businessman who knows a thing or two about running large corporate budgets, or economies, if you will.


However, it was hardly just the Mitt Romney hour. Gov. Mike Huckabee, while not wowing the crowd on anything he had to say, certainly didn’t do any damage to his campaign. And since illegal immigration was off limits for this “debate,” nobody could lay a glove on him there. And for some reason, none of the candidates are bringing up Huckabee’s less-than-stellar record on pardons and commutations while governor of Arkansas.


USA Today declared Fred Thompson the winner in yesterday’s discussion. And while I admit that he scored some points by criticizing the National Education Association, I hardly think that he truly won the debate. I must say, though, that I agreed with Thompson when he said that entitlement spending must be reduced. And one of the ways he proposed to do that was by eliminating Medicare for the wealthy in American society.


Rudy Giuliani, the most socially liberal of the G.O.P. candidates, called for reducing government spending by “imposing spending caps on the civilian agencies and governments, 5 percent, 10 percent, maybe 15 percent." He also mentioned reducing corporate taxes, and doing away with the estate tax altogether.


Rep. Tom Tancredo, defying the apparent ban on addressing the issue of illegal immigration, called massive immigration a problem, and the non-assimilation of immigrants “a catastrophe.”


Regarding climate change, or global warming, the moderator, Ms. Washburn, played a childish game of raise your hand if you think climate change is a serious issue. Fred Thompson replied, “I’m not doing hand shows today…You wanna give me a minute to answer that?” To which Washburn said no.


I found that to be very childish and rude on her part. She turned this into Romper Room instead of a serious debate among serious contenders for the most important office in the land.


Gov. Romney, for his part, called it “global warming, not America warming,” saying that other countries have a responsibility to reduce greenhouse emissions as well.


The biggest surprise of the so-called debate was the appearance of Alan Keyes. While I guess he is running for president, he is a name scarcely heard in presidential politics. And there was some post-debate confusion about why Keyes had been invited in the first place. Supposedly, the rules state that to be invited to the debate in Iowa, you have to have a campaign headquarters there, which Keyes has not.


However, Keyes did manage to get off a good one-liner which seemed to humor the audience. Speaking of global warming, Keyes said, “I'm in favor of reducing global warming," Keyes continued, "because I think the most important emission we need to control is the hot air emission of politicians who pretend one thing and don't deliver." I must say, the ambassador has a point there.


All in all, I think the “debate” was a huge disappointment. The candidates rarely got to engage one another, and Ms. Washburn seemed to have no business moderating this thing. As I said, it reminded me more of Romper Room than a serious debate about serious issues.

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mike Huckabee's Shamnesty for Illegal Aliens!

Posted on Wednesday, December 12 @ 12:50:16 CST
Topic: Americans for Legal Immigration PAC
Mike Huckabee's Shamnesty for Illegal Aliens!

December 12, 2007

by William Gheen
President of Americans for Legal Immigration PAC
ALIPAC
www.alipac.us

In August of 2005, I was called for an interview by THV-TV News out of Little Rock Arkansas to comment on Governor Mike Huckabee's comments complaining about an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raid on local chicken plants, which resulted in the arrest of 119 illegal aliens. What I said during the interview is even more relevant today "Governor Huckabee is known nationally as an illegal alien’s best friend!"

At the time, Mike Huckabee was known nationally for supporting in-state tuition for illegal aliens, which is massively opposed by American voters four to one! This plan forces American taxpayers to subsidize tuition for illegal aliens, thus replacing American students in the limited seats in colleges, while providing the wrong message and encouraging more people to illegally immigrate and bring their children into the U.S. to be trained for jobs, it is illegal for them to have!

The fact that Mike Huckabee would support a policy change despised by 80% of those he swore to represent in public office says a lot about what we could expect from the man as President.

Furthermore, his open denouncement of ICE raids in Arkansas is probably the result of his heavy financial support from Open Borders corporations like Tyson Foods. In Arkansas, the chicken processing lobby is so powerful they call it "Big Chicken".

While the public was cheering the raids, Tyson Foods was upset about ICE raids and so was their bought and paid for politician Mike Huckabee!

Tyson Foods Inc., has their global headquarters located in Springdale, Arkansas and they are the worlds largest processor and marketer of chicken, beef, and pork. They were large contributors to Mike Huckabee as Governor and now their federal political action committee, TYPAC, is backing his campaign for President.

Tyson Foods Inc. is one of the most egregious corporate violators of our Federal laws against hiring illegals in America!

In 2003, the U.S. Justice Department claimed that 15 Tyson plants in nine states had been conspiring since 1994 to recruit illegal immigrants, and that this practice was known by senior executives at Tyson corporate headquarters. It was determined in court that Tyson managers had been intentionally working with organized crime elements and temporary service agencies to import illegal alien workers, replace their American workers, and drive down wages. Tyson agreed to join the basic pilot program to screen new employees in 2004, but later raids continued to find large numbers of illegal aliens working for Tyson!

Earlier this year, the company supported the thrice-failed "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" amnesties that were pushed in the U.S. Senate. These legislative attempts to legalize Tyson's illegal labor workforce failed due to massive public opposition with Zogby polls showing only 3% of Americans approving of how Congress was handling the issue! The backlash was so massive that angry calls to lawmakers, which were ranging 50 to 1 opposed, overloaded and shut down the entire Capital phone system!

Mike Huckabee is now experiencing a surge in the polls as GOP core voters continue to abandon John McCain and Rudy Giuliani for their pro Amnesty pro illegal alien records and stances. This is bringing Huckabee's immigration stances into the limelight for scrutiny and his campaign is fully aware that missteps on this issue can send him back down the ladder like McCain and Giuliani.

That is why his campaign has released the "The Secure America Plan" which details his 9-point plan to facilitate the "enforcement of our immigration laws and results in the attrition of the illegal immigrant population"

This is exactly what America wants to hear, America wants to hear about reducing the number or illegal aliens in America. Americans want illegal aliens to return to their home nations as current law dictates!

However, there is a big problem with Huckabee's plan. While most of the provisions will be positively received by the American public, especially voters, his promises to crack down on employers, build a fence, and bolster the border patrol are all nullified by positions number 3 and 9.

Huckabee makes it clear that illegal aliens will have to leave the U.S. However, what he is advocating is the 'touch back' provision which was a trick fielded by the supporters of the failed "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" amnesty bills in the U.S. Senate this year.

In position #9, Huckabee says he would increase visas and expedite immigration processes so "those patiently and responsibly seeking to come here legally will not have to wait decades to share in the American Dream"

Such changes would clearly increase legal immigration levels, which already stand at 1.4 million per year, making America the most generous nation in the world for legal immigration. The majority of the American public, while generally supportive of legal immigrants, is in no mood for such a massive expansion of legal immigration levels considering the intense public backlash against illegal immigration.

Huckabee's intent to expedite legal immigration ties into the real problem with his plan. This is revealed in item #3, where he would grant amnesty to illegal aliens by having them sign up with the government and then leave the U.S. for a day or two and later on pick up new documents across the border to walk back in and say "Look at me! I came in legally this time!"

What a devilish farce! Millions of illegal aliens in America would quickly have no fear of immigration law enforcement and would be on the "path to citizenship" receiving benefits at the taxpayers’ expense. This provision would in effect nullify all of the other immigration enforcement promises of Mike Huckabee.

The mere fact that Mike Huckabee's campaign is imitating the tactics that the pro Amnesty lobby in Washington, DC deployed earlier this year tells us exactly who he serves and that he is willing to try and deceive the American public to accomplish his political agenda! Mike Huckabee has is now promoting the Pence Plan that we call SHAMNESTY!

One more President like that in the White House and we can kiss America goodbye. We will have millions of illegal aliens who have become untouchable by immigration authorities and millions more on the way once America has shown she is defenseless against the Global corporations pushing this agenda!

It gets worse, according to Michelle Malkin's article "Meet the GOP's Border Control Cross-Dressers" (Dec. 11, 2007) Huckabee joins McCain and Guiliani on the dishonest pro amnesty politician front!

It appears that Mike Huckabee has been pandering to the Open Borders Hispanic racist group LULAC (League of United Latin American Citizens), where he has promised them an 'open door' policy. He has also criticized state legislators in Arkansas who wanted to require proof of citizenship to register to vote! That really takes the cake when you think about the fact Mike Huckabee wants illegal aliens to be able to vote!

Even more disturbing is Mike Huckabee's decision to follow the deplorable lead of Senator's Harry Reid and Ted Kennedy by deriding Americans who are concerned about illegal immigration and opposed to the Senate AMNESTY bills as "driven by racism or nativism."

In an attempt to build street credibility, the Huckabee campaign claims they were inspired to create their plan from an article by Center for Immigration Studies (Cis.org) Mark Krikorian. While Mr. Krikorian is renowned for his concepts of attrition enforcement, he is opposed to the Touchback amnesty provisions Huckabee's team built in as this measure would nullify all of the other enforcement provisions listed! Mr. Krikorian, while cited as a source by Mike Huckabee's team, would probably call the plan another "No Amnesty Amnesty".

Mike Huckabee is clearly an Open Borders fanatic.

This is why there is a shockwave moving through the immigration enforcement movement after hearing of the endorsement of the Huckabee campaign by Co-Founder of the original Minuteman Project, Jim Gilchrist.

The embarrassing truth is that Jim Gilchrist has forced distance between himself and the vast majority of other groups and leaders in the immigration enforcement movement over the last year because of his egotistical, unstable, destructive, and growingly bizarre behavior. His behind the scenes actions have created a great deal of alarm from groups such as ALIPAC who were a part of the original Minuteman effort and who have supported Mr. Gilchrist in the past.

After Jim Gilchrist split with co-founder Chris Simcox of the Minuteman Civil Defense Corps, he quickly made enemies out of any group that refused to take a side in the conflict. He would not respect the neutrality of other sovereign groups and adopted an "with us or against us" stance that drove many away.

Jim Gilchrist's last attempt to muster Minutemen volunteers fell apart during the Laredo Texas operations he launched. While the opening day had many attendees, within one week there were less than ten volunteers on the border and Gilchrist himself was not even present most of the time.

Since that time, Jim has been engaged in a bitter battle against the Executive Board of his 501(c) organization after they terminated him from his position as director, which has thrown the whole organization into court battles. While most of our movement was neck deep in the battle against the Senate "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" amnesty bills, Gilchrist was busy sending out his next wave of bitter e-mails decrying the actions of the "hijackers" of his organization.

Many of us in the movement have been keeping quiet about these problems, the threatening e-mails, and personal attacks, hoping that Jim Gilchrist would fade into the background, where his reckless behavior and failed organization could do no further harm to the movement, which is much bigger than Minuteman. We had hoped that his initial contributions to the cause in Minuteman 1 could be saved from his actions of late. Today, the rest of the nation is painfully learning what we know about Jim Gilchrist, due to his endorsement of pro amnesty Open Borders Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee.

Since the Minuteman Project is a tax-free nonprofit organization, which is prohibited by law from endorsing candidates, one has to wonder why Jim Gilchrist is making endorsements for President, which will surely be challenged by other Presidential campaigns and pro amnesty groups.

Perhaps Jim just skimmed over the Huckabee plan like many Americans will do and fell for the bait? It is likely that he was so happy to hear from a Presidential campaign in the midst of his isolation that he jumped at the opportunity to be relevant again?

Jim Gilchrist and Mike Huckabee have made a terrible mistake by supporting a Presidential campaign which has stances in favor of "touchback" amnesty for illegal aliens, benefits for illegal aliens, voting access for illegal aliens, "comprehensive immigration reform" amnesty, expanded visa programs, and more legal immigration. They are both attempting to give the illegal aliens, the US Chamber of Commerce, and their supporting groups like Tyson Foods, LULAC, and La Raza exactly what they want, while trying to dupe the American public.

As Americans representing the 80% of our fellow countrymen and women who oppose this radical Open Borders agenda, we must do all we can to expose Mike Huckabee's true stances and record. We must also make it clear to Jim Gilchrist that he has just erased any positive contributions he may have made in the past to the immigration enforcement movement by lending his support to an 'Illegal Alien's best friend'.

---

Paid for by Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC)
http://www.alipac.us
Post Office Box 30966, Raleigh, NC 27622-0966
Tel: (919) 787-6009 Toll Free: (866) 329-3999
FEC ID: C00405878
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Culture of Death

I wrote this article a couple of years ago after a teenager went on a mass killing spree. Now, after what we have seen recently in Omaha and Colorado, it seemed appropriate to dust it off and run it again. Since I am a new blogger to Townhall, I guess it will actually be a debut here.

It is a very serious matter, folks. If we don't get a grip on the 'Culture of Death' which we have created for our kids, God only knows the horrors this world will see. However, I can assure you, they will be far worse than the horrific acts we have seen to date.

ARTICLE

A Culture of Death

By: Michael A. Minton


Another school shooting, this time in Minnesota. The gunman: a boy of 16 who has grown up in this country which values life, especially innocent life, but little. The results: 10 dead, including the shooter, and 7 wounded. The bottom line: we produced him…and many just like him.

I do not want to appear to be giving this kid a pass here, certainly his actions were terribly wrong. I think we could all agree that it is just flat wrong to kill innocent people in cold blood...ESPECIALLY children. Oh, wait, that sounds kind of like abortion, doesn’t it?


According to statistics from the Alan Guttmacher Institute, between 1973 (Roe v. Wade) and 1998, there have been 36.5 MILLION legal abortions in the United States of America. This would be the murder of 36.5 MILLION INNOCENT children. How can we POSSIBLY expect the unaborted children in this country to respect other innocent lives? What a fine example we have set for those kids who have survived the abortion holocaust.


Then we have the case of Terri Schiavo in Florida. Here is an innocent woman who is (or at least at one time was) nothing more than disabled. Another fine example for our children: If a person is a burden…kill them. Why go to all the trouble of bathing and feeding such a person. They have nothing productive to add to society, so just terminate them, right?


There are many influences which have contributed to this culture of death to which we are exposing our children. One of the most horrific is the advent of gruesome video games which make slaughtering people nothing more than a feelingless maneuvering of a joystick. Please indulge me and read the following which I have found on the web.


I recently ran a search of “Most violent video games.” I came across a site created by a fellow calling himself Tim “Corleone” Wambolt. “Corleone” lists what he calls the 100 most violent video games of all time. These critiques may be viewed at http://p204.ezboard.com/fthetop100mostviolentvideogamesofalltime87239frm2 . I would like to share his glorifying review of “the most violent game of all time.” It is called Postal 2: Apocalypse Weekend. In this “review,” “Mr. Corleone” just raves about the game’s gruesome ways that you can kill people.


Some examples of these morbid activities are that, “you can brutally murder innocent people in a variety of ways…[Y]ou can shoot people, causing lots of blood to spurt out, you can kick someone to death over and over…[Y]ou can chop their heads off with a shovel and play soccer with their heads….the bodies don’t fade away either, so you can stack corpses into a pile of up to 200.” And this is the mild stuff.


XXX The following is very graphic, and may offend some readers. For the true, shocking effect these games have on these kids, I am leaving the language as it appears on the site. XXX


“Mr. Corleone” continues describing the game…”You can pis* all over people, even in their mouths. [I]f you pis* in a gay guy’s mouth, he’ll enjoy it. If you pis* on a cop’s doughnut he’ll throw up, allowing a disintegration with a shotgun. You can grab a cat and shove the barrel of your gun up its a**hole and use the cat as a silencer. There are even marching parades you can unload on, like a Gay Pride march, a Minority parade, and a cop parade, you can set them on fire…”


“If you want to commit suicide, press the ‘K’ key and you can put a grenade into your mouth saying, ‘I regret nothing’ and blow your whole head apart. [A]nd all this happens to civilians and innocent people minding their own business. There’s no limit to what you can do.” Mind you, this is just ONE of the top 100 cited by “Corleone.”


What kind of sick, twisted minds are we raising in this country that would glorify such evil simulations. And what kind of parent would allow their kid to have such a game. And just as bad, if not worse, is the fact that many parents are probably so uninterested in their children’s activities that they probably have no idea how violent and damaging these games are.


Is it any wonder these kids are killing each other, their parents, grandparents, and police officers on an almost daily basis? Come on America, stand up and be counted. Our children NEED our help. They NEED limits set. And we, as parents, need backbone!


God help us after we have set such examples for our kids. God give us the strength and wisdom to take our country, and our children, back!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Huckabee Comes Under Fire for Pardons as Governor-Michael A. Minton

It would appear that Gov. Huckabee might be in a little hot water as his record of pardons and commutations begins to come to the attention of the press...and the public. Recently, there has been quite a bit of buzz about the former Arkansas governor’s pardoning of Wayne DuMond, who was convicted of raping a teenager in 1984. DuMond was subsequently sentenced to life in prison.


While Huckabee denies any role in the rapist’s release, the Arkansas Times quotes Ermer Pondexter, ex-member of the board of pardons and paroles, as saying that, “I signed the [parole] papers because the governor wanted Dumond paroled. I was thinking the governor was working for the best interests of the state.”

An advisor to Huckabee told the Arkansas paper that, “Huckabee and a senior member of his staff exerted behind-the-scenes influence to bring about the parole of rapist Wayne Dumond.” Shortly after his release, Dumond was said by Missouri authorities to have raped and killed a woman there.


In the meantime, Huckabee was busy blaming DuMond’s eligibility for parole on former Arkansas Governor Jim Guy Tucker, and said the Post Prison Transfer Board made the decision on its own to free Dumond.


However, in the September 1, 2005 Arkansas Times story, the paper claims that Huckabee and a key aide played a role in DuMond’s release. “It was a process marked by deviation from accepted parole practice and direct personal lobbying by the governor, in an apparently illegal and unrecorded closed-door meeting with the parole board (the informal name by which the Post Prison Transfer Board is known).” Board members involved in an executive session with Gov. Huckabee quoted Huckabee as saying DuMond got a “raw deal,” as reported by a board member who was there.


Board chairman Leroy Brownlee personally paved the way for Dumond’s release, according to board records and former members, all at Gov. Huckabee’s bequest. Brownlee reportedly consulted regularly with the governor’s prison liaison, Butch Reeves, from December 1996-January 1997, on the status of Reeves’ efforts to free DuMond, according to state officials.

The Arkansas Times reportedly sought comment from Gov. Huckabee, his office, spokesman Rex Nelson, and Leroy Brownlee repeatedly for the 2005 story, but no response was received according to the newspaper.


The 2005 Arkansas Times article also makes the following claims:

“• Ermer Pondexter, a former member of the Post Prison Transfer Board, says she was persuaded by the parole board chairman Brownlee to vote for Dumond’s release and because she knew the governor supported it.

• The board did not allow its recording secretary to attend a closed session with the governor regarding Dumond, nor was the session taped, a departure from custom.

• Board chair Brownlee [2005 note: Brownless has since been reappointed to the Board by Huckabee] personally interviewed Dumond in prison and set in motion the reconsideration of the board’s August 1996 vote to refuse Dumond parole. Normally, inmates must wait a year after a decision for a new hearing. Thanks to Brownlee’s efforts, Dumond was granted a new parole hearing Jan. 16, 1997, just six weeks after his request for reconsideration. This time, the board voted to parole. Brownlee later was reappointed to the board by Huckabee.

• Dumond was transferred to the Tucker unit in December 1996, after his request for rehearing. Had he stayed at Varner, he could not have been scheduled for a new hearing before Jan. 20, 1997, Huckabee’s deadline to act on his announcement that he was considering commuting Dumond’s sentence. His transfer — which the Department of Corrections has explained in conflicting ways — allowed him to get on the Tucker hearing schedule, which let the board parole DuMond before Huckabee’s deadline — and thus take the heat for his release.”

Just six weeks after DuMond moved to Smithville, MO, Carol Sue Shields, of Parkville, MO., was found murdered in a friend’s home. She had been sexually assaulted and suffocated. Missouri authorities charged DuMond with the first-degree murder of Shields in June, 2001. Skin found under Shields’ fingernails provided a DNA match with DuMond.


And while DuMond’s case is severe, it is hardly an anomaly. Huckabee pardoned or commuted 669 offenders, including 11 convicted murderers, in his first eight years in office. However, Huckabee told the Nashua Telegraph that his number of pardons and commutations was not really that disproportionate compared to prior governors because Arkansas’ “prison population exploded during his tenure.”


The Nashua Telegraph reports that in a 2001 radio interview Gov. Huckabee said that his faith played a role in the number of pardons and commutations he doled out, saying, “I would not deny that my sense of the reality of redemption is a factor…[A]nd I don't know that I can apologize for that because I would hate to think of the kind of human I would be if I thought people were beyond forgiveness and beyond reformation and beyond some sense of improvement."


However, the October 18, 2007 article says, “But on Wednesday, Huckabee said overcrowded prisons better explained his high number of commutations.” It quotes Huckabee as saying, “When I came into the governorship, we had 8,000 inmates in the correctional system…when I left, we had 14,000. The universe in which I operated was substantially larger than the one any other governor had operated because of the number of people sentenced, the number of people who therefore became eligible.”


In just eight years, from 1996-2004, Huckabee’s 669 commutations or pardons were more than those handed out by Clinton and the state’s two previous governors combined over an 18 year period.


However, as the Nashua Gazette points out, “[a]n Arkansas Democrat-Gazette analysis over 44 years found Huckabee's commutation rate was about the same as two Democratic Arkansas chief executives who later became U.S. senators and was less than two other governors serving in the 1960s.”

 

 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Romney Hits It Out Of The Park

For anyone who has been in a cave or a coma for the past 24 hours, Mitt Romney on Thursday gave the speech of a lifetime. At least, a political lifetime, as he is in the fight of his political life. And as fights go, I would have to give Gov. Romney the Heavyweight Title for his inspirational speech.

It was a speech that did not come without its controversy; some of the Governor’s own advisors were against the idea. However, now that it’s over, I can honestly say that Mitt made the right decision in confronting the national debate over his Mormonism head-on. And to me, it also showed that he is a man of character who is going to do what he feels is the right thing, no matter what others may say. A man of conviction, who isn’t afraid to stand by what he believes. In other words…a LEADER.

The former Massachusetts governor delivered a 20 minute speech cleverly entitled “Faith in America,” in which he made clear the distinction he feels is necessary between religion and public service. At one point in his speech, Romney said, “We separate church and state affairs in this country, and for good reason. No religion should dictate to the state nor should the state interfere with the free practice of religion.”

But, he didn’t stop there. He went on to say how some people in this country (in which I would include the ACLU) have basically bastardized the idea of separation of church and state, saying, “But in recent years, the notion of the separation of church and state has been taken by some well beyond its original meaning. They seek to remove from the public domain any acknowledgment of God. Religion is seen as merely a private affair with no place in public life. It is as if they are intent on establishing a new religion in America – the religion of secularism. They are wrong."

It was, by far, the best speech I have heard come from the lips of any presidential candidate of either party. A couple of the most impressive quotes were: “These American values, this great moral heritage, is shared and lived in my religion as it is in yours. I was taught in my home to honor God and love my neighbor…I saw my parents provide compassionate care to others, in personal ways to people nearby, and in just as consequential ways in leading national volunteer movements.”

Romney was also very clear on the role that his religion would play in his service to this great country. He said basically that, while the convictions of his faith will inform his presidency, they will not dictate his decisions or actions. Basically he said that the dictates of the church end where the dictates of public service begin.

He was also clear that while a person’s religion should not be considered a reason to accept him/her, it also should not be grounds to reject that person as a viable candidate and leader.

Apparently, Romney’s speech was also well-received by many religious leaders in the public eye. Borrowing quotes from the Fox News website, C. Welton Gaddy, a Baptist preacher, author and president of the Interfaith Alliance said, “I thought it was as good a statement on religious freedom as we could ever expect from a candidate running for public office…I saw nothing in the speech that could cause concern in the evangelical community,” he said.

Ralph Reed, former executive director of the Christian Coalition, said, “Evangelicals and other conservative people of faith are not only more than willing to vote for someone … who is a member of a different church or synagogue or mosque, but they have actually demonstrated that throughout their history,” Reed said. "I think they need to be addressed and I think (Romney) did so today."

Even Romney’s rivals had nothing bad to say about the speech. Fred Thompson is quoted on the Fox website as saying, “I think it was a good speech. I mean, He made some general points about the importance of faith, which I certainly agree with. We have no religious test in this country for president,” Thompson said, adding “I don’t know why he felt compelled to (give the speech).”

This is just my opinion, but I am Mr. Right Opinion, but that last part of Mr. Thompson’s statement sounded a little bit to me like the speech might have shaken him up a bit. It almost sounds like he’s saying, “It was so good, I wish he hadn’t given it.”

And as for Giuliani, he said, “You would wish that everybody would move beyond (religion)," Giuliani said. "I believe his talk helped to put that issue to rest." Well, I’m sure the former New York mayor does wish people would move beyond religion. I mean, the man married the woman he with whom he was cheating on his former wife, he supports abortion, and there have been recent allegations that he mishandled city funds. I guess I would want voters to put aside religious convictions too, were I in his shoes.

All in all, I can honestly say that Gov. Romney looked, and sounded, more presidential than any other candidate I have seen so far.

I am officially throwing Mr. Right Opinion’s support behind Mitt Romney for President of the United States of America!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who Wants to Homosexualize a Seven Year Old?

I almost fell over when I read this story. It comes from CNS News, and it boggles the mind. The story is called, “Candidates Split on Pro-Gay Book for 2nd Graders” By Pete Winn CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer.

Who in the world could be in favor of reading a book to second graders about a prince who, instead of marrying a princess, decides to marry her BROTHER. That’s right…her BROTHER! Talk about a “fairy” tale…or should I say “fairy tail?” The book is called “King and King.”

What in the world has our society come to? Why do some Americans deem it necessary to indoctrinate innocent children into a lifestyle choice that is both a sin and looked down upon by mainstream America? Men marrying men and women marrying women is just not natural, and it is an abomination before God. If, when these kids become adults, that’s the lifestyle they want to choose, so be it.

I have said before, I have no right to tell you how to conduct your bedroom activities. However, I have EVERY RIGHT as a parent to say what kind of trash will NOT be allowed in my childrens’ school curriculum.

As you might expect, Republicans have come out against this being part of a second grader’s curriculum, while liberal Democrats are embracing the notion. I guess that’s no real shocker there.

As for Fred Thompson, here is the quote from CNS News: “The answer is no," Thompson's chief campaign spokesman told Cybercast News Service. "He's very clear. There is no wishy-washiness."

Mitt Romney also spoke out on the issue, saying, “This is a subject that should be left to parents, not public school teachers," the former Massachusetts governor said in a statement. "We need to strengthen our families by passing a federal marriage amendment and also insisting on marriage before having children."

While I agree with the Governor that we need to strengthen our families, I am still torn on the federal amendment issue. However, there is no question that this is most certainly an issue that parents should be deciding, not the public school system. I believe insisting on marriage before having children is a good idea, but I also think it’s a pipe dream.

But what of the Democrats on this issue? John Edwards responded by saying, “Yes, absolutely," Edwards said. "What I want ... is my children to understand everything about the difficulties that gay and lesbian couples are faced with every day; the discrimination that they're faced with every single day of their lives." Well, Mr. Edwards, if you want your children to know that, teach it to them. Don’t leave it up to a stranger in a classroom to do YOUR job!

Mr. Edwards dug his grave a little deeper, saying, "Nobody made me God," said the former North Carolina senator. "I want my children to be able to make that decision on behalf of themselves, and I want them to be exposed to all the information, even in - did you say second grade? Second grade might be a little tough, but even in second grade." With all due (or undue) respect, sir, God made you god over your children. If you feel that you can’t handle raising your kids, you certainly don’t need to be leading our country!

Obama didn’t really address the school issue. The CNS quote is, “Obama, a Democratic senator from Illinois, said he and his wife have already talked to their 9-year-old and 6-year-old about same-sex marriage.

"One of the things I want to communicate to my children is not to be afraid of people who are different, because there have been times in our history where I was considered different," he told his questioner, New England Cable News reporter Allison King.

At least I think he has the right idea. This is a subject that should be handled at home, although I think age 6 is a little young for such an adult topic. So, we don’t really know where Sen. Obama stands on the public school system indoctrinating children into homosexuality.

Hillary, in her typical “Clinton-esque” style, dodged the question. Her CNS quote was: “I think that obviously it is better to try to work with your children, to help your children understand the many differences that are in the world and to really respect other people and the choices that other people make," she said. "And that goes far beyond sexual orientation." No word on whether she thinks it should be taught in schools…although I have a sneaking suspicion that it would not be a problem for her.

To conclude, I don’t think that any of the Democrat presidential hopefuls did themselves any favors by either embracing, or at least not rejecting, the idea of teaching homosexuality to 7 year olds. I tell you, I would not vote for one of them if I was told that I would be hanged if I didn’t. It is despicable to think that we have leaders who actually favor this kind of immoral teaching to our kids.

After I write this and post it, I will be calling my kids’ school to see if this book is in their curriculum. And if it is, you may well hear the name Mike Minton on tonight’s newscast.

Until next time…
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Not in My Country

I received a very interesting email today from Americans For Legal Immigration (http://www.alipac.us/index.html), which shows that an overwhelming majority of Americans DO NOT support what the majority of elected officials are trying to shove down the taxpayer’s throat…benefits for illegal immigrants.

As a man who has gone to Cochise County, AZ and patrolled the border with Chris Simcox (co-founder of the Minutemen), I know first-hand what the real deal is there. These are not people who are coming across the border because they love America and want to assimilate into American society. Some are, I am sure. But I am equally sure that many of them are coming for a host of other reasons: a free ride, better medical care, drug smuggling, and other nefarious activities.

Our “public servants” would have you believe that these are honest hardworking people coming here to do jobs that no American would stoop so low to do. I have two letters to sum up my opinion on that--B.S.. I know that, as a kid, I used to cut grass for money, I worked an assembly line at the age of 14, had a newspaper route, flipped burgers, you name it. The problem is not that Americans won’t do the work; it is that the Americans won’t do the work for $5.00 per hour.

At any rate, the email I received had some pretty interesting polling statistics. They cite a survey by the American Pulse ™ which shows that of 4,069 respondents, 81.7% oppose giving a driver’s license to illegals, 89.3% opposed giving them a business license, 82.8% opposed giving them housing assistance, educational benefits were opposed by 76.7%, and 73.7% opposed job training for illegals.

These are very compelling numbers, folks. When we are talking about percentages that are in the 70’s and 80’s, and we still have politicians giving these benefits away to illegals, then you know that your elected ‘representatives’ are NOT representing you. They are self-righteous, self-serving, pandering idiots who feel it necessary to placate certain special interest groups for their own glorification and/or gratification.

It’s high time we put an end to this foolishness. I mean we have entire states allowing illegals to not only go to college, but to do it at the reduced in-state cost! We have cities, such as Mayor Giuliani’s beloved New York which have been “sanctuary cities,” so if an illegal is arrested for, say, burglary, nobody is allowed to inform the feds. And there are untold numbers of hospitals along our border with Mexico which are closing up shop because they can’t get paid for the services they are REQUIRED BY LAW to provide to illegals.

I am including a copy of the email I received, as it has some good suggestions on what we, the American people, can do to turn the tide. It reads as follows:

Massive Win for us if you saturate the nation with this poll information! You cannot rely on the Main Stream Media to do this for you.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Many of you will remember when new polling data came out twice during our battles against "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" AMNESTY earlier this year and we sent you the polls telling you how you could use them to defeat the bills.

That tactic worked well and today we have a new poll that, if used properly, can have a major impact for our cause and against illegal immigration.


1. Save a copy of this poll information for future debates and exchanges.
2. Please forward a copy of this poll information or link to all of your contacts.
3. Call into talk radio shows to talk about this poll.
4. Write letters To The Editor of your local papers discussing this poll.
5. SEND THIS POLL TO EVERY FEDERAL, STATE, and LOCAL LAWMAKER AND MEDIA CONTACT YOU CAN LOCATE.

Number 5 is the most important and will take you some time. It takes legwork to locate the website for your state assemblies and painstakingly go through the site sending emails to each lawmaker, BUT THIS IS WORTH IT!

This poll absolutely destroys the positions of any illegal immigration supporting lawmaker or reporter.

This poll will energize Americans that share our views while demoralizing the opposition.

This poll, properly deployed, can help in the battles against licenses and benefits for illegal aliens that is raging in many states.


ALIPAC is sending copies of this poll to over 300 allied organizations and leaders we are in contact with asking them to forward the poll and to get it mentioned on national TV and talk shows.

ALIPAC will be sending this out to our national press list of almost 40,000 members of the media.

ALIPAC will be deploying this polling data today in NC in our battle against illegal aliens in community colleges.

ALIPAC will make this poll part of our regular media appearances.

Here is the tool you need. Now use it to strike a mighty blow for our cause!

Benefits to Illegals? Overwhelming Majority Don't Think So
http://www.alipac.us/article-2769-thread-1-0.html
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive